Copiapoa - Living on the Edge
Online Publications
  home [ References ]  
 

  

ISLAYA LAUI? by Roger Ferryman

In his travelogue, published in the American Cactus Journal, Alfred Lau made mention of a new cactus species he had found near Tocopilla. He stated that the plant was new to science and needed further investigation. His initial thoughts were that the plant was a Neochilenia, later a juvenile Copiapoa tocopillana, but his investigations led him to believe it to be a new Copiapoa species. During my correspondence with him he indicated that the plant was in all probability a new Copiapoa and would therefore represent the most northerly member of the genus. Lau then made a further specific visit to the site upon his return from the I.O.S. Convention in Argentina. He wrote to me stating that he had found the plant again and from its seed structure it was a Copiapoa.

He urged me to visit the site and make further investigations, such was his enthusiasm for his discovery. This I did in 1987 and was fortunate to find a few plants one of which was in fruit. The fruit was the large hollow balloon type associated with Islaya. The seed therein was large, glossy black and quite unlike any Islaya seed I know. On the basis of the seed alone, Lau’s initial reaction that the plant was a Copiapoa is quite understandable.


At The Chileans’ Weekend the following year (1988), I showed a number of slides of this plant, taken in habitat, my own slides of the fruit and seeds, supported by Lau’s slides of plants which he had flowered subsequent to his discovery. Placement of this plant proved difficult as it contained elements of different genera: Islaya fruit, seed typically Copiapoa, and the flower being small, yellow, and naked again resembles Copiapoa, Islaya, or Mila! For my part, the plant rests best with Islaya, a point the subsequent author of this exciting discovery J.Luthy supports despite placing it in the all-embracing Eriosyce.


The fruit I collected contained 10 seeds, which I split with one of my travelling companions. My 5 seeds produced 3 clones, each of which were grafted and flowered within two or three years so that I am pleased to report that seeds and plants have been distributed to a number of interested folk.


The habitat location is not for the faint hearted or indeed the day tripper. The coastal mountains between Antofagasta and Tocopilla rise very steeply from the shoreline. There is sufficient flat ground between the mountain and the sea to support a road and there are also several small bays for the intrepid holidaymaker. Within these mountains exist a few mines and it is often possible to climb to a considerable height utilising their access roads. Moreover, it is sometimes possible to utilise the very basic cable lifts that take miners to the higher reaches. However, very few of these save much more than the initial third to half of the climb! Few of the mines I know can be regarded as long term and they disappear as suddenly as they appear.


The climb for Islaya laui was pretty arduous, and on reaching the perceived top one quickly encounters Eulychnia which were for the best part dead. Neochilenia saxifraga and Copiapoa tocopillana were also evident and reasonably represented. The view from the top was spectacular, with the sea visible to the south as well as to the west. My instruction was to continue forward, over the trough that runs north to south in line with the mountain range.


During the several hours of walking, I questioned in my mind the veracity of the Lau details and moreover I questioned my sanity! Nothing, but nothing, grew there and it looked like nothing ever had. There were few pointers to confirm that I was following Lau’s instructions. The mining territorial markers were there and indeed used by me for the same reason as the miners:  a guide. After descending into and crossing the trough, another steep incline was in front of us and after some ascent, Eriosyce laui was re-found. 


The first specimens took some time to discover, growing multi-headed under rocks but the fruit giving away the natural camouflage. Further specimens were discovered but in reality very few for the time we spent there. All plants were offsetting (as they do indeed readily from seed) but the plants themselves were very frail looking. There was obvious evidence of flower and fruit so even in this remote barren area they were at least producing the potential for reproduction and as the plants in cultivation are not self-fertile, there must exist a pollinator, all be it a very patient one! The peaks of this mountain range were still some way off - indeed they looked as far away as when we started the second stage of the ascent. Climbers will know the feeling. What looked an hour away was still an hour away!


The precise habitat details must remain protected, due to the scarcity of the population. But during the course of 1999 I am committed to a study of this region when I hope to map the potential distribution. Rains occurred in 1998 consequently providing a good opportunity to see if this remarkable species exists elsewhere. It would appear from correspondence and discussions with W.Krahn that he has made concerted efforts to locate this plant in areas surrounding the known site, including Mantas del la Luna and has found Copiapoa tocopillana and Neochilenia saxifraga but not the elusive Eriosyce.


Growing this plant from seed presents an interesting challenge. The resultant seedlings reach a size when they appear to sit still, much like Ariocarpus. What is happening is that the plant is actually forming its rootstock. Although I have never dug up a plant in the wild due to their scarcity, it was evident that it had an enlarged root. Nor would it appear to be like Thelocephala, but more like the flaked woody roots seen in many Copiapoa rootstocks. My seedlings were quickly grafted to speed growth and ensure a better chance of survival. The resulting propagations have been spread around and the plant now seems to be in a large number of collections both here and abroad. 


Many of Lau’s propagations by seed have been widely distributed and as a result collectors have had the opportunity to obtain a really unique species. As for the plants in the wild, it remain unclear what their success is. Ever the optimist, I believe that if Lau was able to find them again after a gap of some 15 years, then I have as good a chance after a similar lapse of time.

 

Ripe fruit (Roger Ferryman) 

from Harry Middleditch

Of the habitat slides taken during the course of this expedition, which were shown by R.Ferryman to the 1988 Chileans’ Weekend, the one which tends to stick in the mind is that taken from the top of the first coastal range. This overlooked a quebrada whose steep sides appeared to be formed of great jagged boulders, piled one upon the other, with not a sign of a track or a vestige of vegetation. Looking straight across over the considerable drop to the floor of the quebrada, it must have been all of half a mile to the steep rise on the opposite side, where the mountains rose even higher. Bearing this in mind, it seems to be most remarkable that Lau should ever have stumbled across this new discovery in this wide wilderness.


Unripe fruit (John Gamesby)


From John Gamesby

My two grafted plants of Eriosyce laui were obtained from Hoogvliet nursery in Holland; I was told that they were grown from seed which originated from R.Ferryman. They do clump very freely but until the new offsets are about 4 to 5 mm in size, they are mostly hidden by the thick wool. The bodies are now about 30mm across. Both plants produced a crop of buds right in the crown, the flowers opening from early June onwards. No fruit was produced until I crossed the two plants which were not co-operating by flowering together so some pollen was stored in the fridge for a few days. The fruit has been on the plant since July; it is somewhat skittle shaped and measures 15 mm tall by 8 mm in diameter, with a roughish shiny black surface. The withered flower remains continue to stay attached to the fruit. The appearance of the fruit has not changed until now (late October).

I do have a few Islaya that flower and most of them are now covered in fruit. Even when small, these Islaya fruit are a balloon shape and a bright pink colour. I find that Islaya have scented flowers which smell of old hospital disinfectant whereas Islaya laui has no discernible odour. Compared with I. laui, my other Islaya have a shorter and thicker flower tube, petals broader and more numerous and of a clear pale yellow colour, none with any hint of the reddish brown stipe on the outermost petals as on laui. In fact, the flowers are totally different.

 

Early next year I intend to remove one of the offsets in order to try and establish it on its own roots, as these plants are said to be very slow from seed if not grafted.

 

Plant in flower (John Gamesby)


from David Rushforth

In 1997 I obtained several of these plants from M.Bouma in Czechoslovakia but as none of them set seed I presumed that they were of the same clone. When I visited him again in June 1998, I enquired whether he had other clones. He had - but was unaware which was which, so he gave me a plant which already had seed pods. These were short and black just like the seed pods shown to us by J.Gamesby at The Chileans’ Weekend. Shortly afterwards, they did elongate and turned pink in the process. I would assume that they were from 1998 flowers, - surely they would not take more than 12 months to mature? So assuming that they flowered in May, it would be either 3 to 4 months, or 15 months, before they matured. The mature fruit became 3.25cm long and 1.2 cm wide, looking just like fruit on Islaya. When the fruit showed signs of wrinkling it was slit from top to bottom for the purpose of showing the interior on slide.

---------- end of page ----------