Copiapoa - Living on the Edge
Online Texts
  home [ References ]  

The Chileans

Volume 9, #33 : 117

Copiapoa cinerea (Phil) Br. & R.

By Karel Knize 


Translated by P. Collins from Kaktusy ‘69 No.3.

Echinocactus cinereus, described more than 100 years ago, is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful (and I would also say well-known) Chilean cacti. The author of the description, R.A. Philippi, was numbered among the greatest experts on the Chilean flora in the past century. In his study of unusually interesting plants in his native country, he dedicated himself to a considerable extent to cacti, and so his name is associated with many species.

In the year 1860, he described several cacti, among them Echinocactus cinereus. The author’s “broad” statements about the habitat of this species must today be regarded as unconvincing, especially at that point in the description where mention is made of a continuous, cactus-covered area between the township of Taltal and the settlement of El Cobre. All authors (including Hutchison and Backeberg) later took over these original statements, although it is immensely difficult even to get across the coastal desert to the north, not to speak of a more detailed investigation; it is not a question of a few kilometres, but a full hundred in very challenging, parched terrain.

The coast in this rugged landscape is broken up by rocks, so that there is almost no continuous, sandy beach. The many cliffs, as it were, often drop straight into the sea. The landscape opens out in a wide bay, and among the hills, reaching up to 300 m high, lies the township of Taltal. The only water-course here is the Quebrada de Taltal, a small brooklet, often drying up, in the neighbourhood of which, along the lower part of the stream, are the most important and most abundant stands of Copiapoa cinerea. This area was presumably not always so dry, a fact to which numerous dried-up river beds testify, just where these very fine specimens grow. I have seen a thousand acres of the whitish columns of these magnificent plants, a metre tall in places. In the next part of the Quebrada de Taltal - at a distance of about 5 km from the town - almost uniformly black-spined plants grow for a space of about 3 km. Copiapoa cinerea also occurs plentifully on the neighbouring hills, where however, I observed them to be different in the colouring of their spines, especially on the crown. Among experts, the plants which have black spines on the crown are considered as the Type.

On my own expeditions, I have found solitary plants of this species, as well as crested plants and those which grow in groups; a widely-branched cluster is not exceptional. Hutchison in his own work mentions various forms and he designated several distinct groups, which, all things considered, form a logical species complex. There remains only the question of designating those variations which remain constant from generation to generation. I also found pure white forms which correspond to the Ritter novelty, Copiapoa cinerea var. albispina (FR 207, FR 207a); nearly all the specimens had white spines, only a few were coloured yellowish or brown. The wool in the crown was whitish or greyish. I do not regard this form as stable, because white spines occur - though rarely - in a lot of other places. It is very interesting also to compare the number of the spines, which are difficult to differentiate into centrals and radials. Most common are the forms with 6 spines, the rarest are those with one; the spines are generally stout, glossy, slightly curved, up to 3 cm long. The epidermis of mature plants is chalky white; in small seedlings up to 6 to 8 cm in diameter it is brownish to reddish­violet.

There are also considerable differences in the flowers, and in the form and number of the straw-coloured petals. The 1.2 to 1.7 cm long fruits have a cylindrical form and are as a rule hidden in the wool of the crown. The fruit at maturity splits at the top and gapes open, so that the seeds may slip out easily; unripe seeds are often destroyed by ants, which will consume up to 90% of the crop.

The vicinity of Taltal, then, is the principal discovery-place of Copiapoa cinerea, the last specimens of which I found at a distance of about 8 km from the town (in a southerly direction) near the sea, while in a northerly direction they occurred up to 5 km from the town and even then only scantily; further to the north (18 to 20 km from Taltal) I found yet another species, known as C. haseltoniana. I believe that only a more detailed phytogeographical investigation will define the real extent of the habitat.of Copiapoa cinerea.


Comments

from H. Middleditch

From other published literature it would appear that the length of coast between Taltal and Paposo is blessed with a slightly heavier, frequent, and more reliable blanket of mist than any other part of this arid coast to the north or south of this section. By comparison with the general nature of the vegetation in the adjacent areas, that between Taltal and Paposo probably struck Philippi by its comparative richness. 

It does occur to me, therefore, that Philippi may be using some author’s licence when he describes this area as “continuous cactus-covered”, whereas it was the relative richness of the flora which he was trying to emphasize. To date I have been unable to gain sight of Philippi’s book describing his trip through the Atacama desert, which might provide some indication of the context in which this statement was made.

It does come as something of a surprise to find from Knize that the single-spined version of this species is far less common than plants with several spines per areole. We might possibly have been excused for thinking otherwise - the photograph used by Frank to illustrate his account of his visit to Chile, the plant selected by Backeberg for his “Wunderwelt Kakteen”, the photograph used by Knize to accompany the above article, all depict Copiapoa cinerea with a single spine per areole.

Prized seedlings of this species in U.K. collections seem to display one spine per areole rather more frequently than other versions. So the diligent field collectors have treated us all to the rarities, have they, rather than to the ecological type? And does our cover sketch more nearly represent a typical Copiapoa cinerea? It is now fairly easy to understand that when Phillipi chose a specimen with five or six radial spines as the Type for Echinocactus cinerea, he was selecting the variation which was most numerous at the habitat site.


---------- end of page ----------