Copiapoa humilis
subsp.
varispinata
(Ritter)
D. Hunt,
Cact. Syst.
Init.
13:
14 (2002).
Basionym:
C.
variispinata
Ritter,
Kakteen in
Südamerika
3: 1070 (1980).
Synonym:
C.
paposoensis
Ritter,
Kakteen in
Südamerika
3: 1068 (1980).
T his
is another Ritter discovery from the 1960s and described by him as
Copiapoa variispinata in 1980. David Hunt corrected the
spelling by replacing the ‘ii’ with a single ‘i’ when naming it as
a subspecies of C. humilis. This is a very misunderstood
taxon which Graham Charles discusses in some depth in his book
Copiapoa. The recently named C. ahremephiana (the most
northerly member of the Copiapoa cinerea group which grows
near the Botija valley) was mistaken for this species for many
years. It is a big mystery why Ritter did not discover that taxon
too as it grows only a few kilometres further up the coast from
the type locality of C. humilis subsp. varispinata.
I am certain if he had found it he would have described it as a
new species.
C. humilis
subsp. varispinata grows
in the vicinity of the Iscuña Valley, some 50km north of Paposo,
as reported by Ritter. The plants I saw in habitat tended to be
small squat plants, wider than high, growing among rocks and
stones, distinctly ribbed with 15-18 ribs, forming small clusters.
The spination is variable, as alluded to in the name,
although this appeared to have more to do with the size and age of
the plants, as is typical in the
C. humilis
group. Smaller
specimens with shorter spination immediately suggested to me a
close
relationship with C. humilis subsp.
tenuissima, showing similar juvenile characteristics.

Figure 11 Copiapoa humilis subsp.
varispinata ‘paposoensis’
(cultivated plant ex DeHerdt) – a very strong spined, high
altitude variant of this taxon
Larger
plants had longer and more mature spination although somewhat
variable. The distribution of the population we investigated was
limited to 300m in altitude; no plants were found above that
height. Unusually for
C. humilis,
the
epidermis has a grey-grey colour in habitat. In cultivation, seed
raised plants are green. The tubercles are of an identical size
and structure to C. humilis subsp. tenuissima,
particularly in smaller plants. Also similar is the spination, the
radial spines are 4mm long, spreading evenly around areole, 10-14
in number. Central spines occur on larger plants and are 10- 15mm
long and up to 5 in number. Flowers are approximately 30mm across,
growing from the woolly apex, and have a reddish mid-stripe on the
outside of the petals.

Figure 12 Copiapoa humilis subsp.
varispinata PH443.01
(Quebrada Iscuña 200m)
T his taxon and C. humilis subsp.
tenuissima are similar in many respects and more closely
related to each other than to any other subspecies of C.
humilis. However C. humilis subsp. varispinata
seems to be selffertile, as observed in cultivation, whereas C.
humilis subsp. tenuissima is self-sterile (J. Lüthy,
pers. comm.). C. humilis subsp. tenuissima should be
considered a fixed juvenile form which has adapted to grow at
higher altitudes, in a drier environment. It has been reported
from as far south as the Botija valley, which is perilously close
to the habitat of C. humilis subsp. varispinata!

Figure 13 Copiapoa humilis subsp.
varispinata PH443.01
(Quebrada Iscuña 200m)
I have been lucky enough to examine original
Ritter material of C. humilis subsp. varispinata
(FR1447) in cultivation. The plants, all over 30 years old, are
much larger than I had observed in habitat and show very variable
spination length, even in similarly sized specimens. I suspect
that just like the case of C. humilis subsp. tenuissima,
plants of this size do not exist in habitat. Copiapoa
paposoensis is a taxon which Ritter discovered 20km north of
Paposo. It grows high up in the hills,
|