Copiapoa - Living on the Edge
Copiapoa in Habitat
  home [2001]     [2003]     [2004]     [2006]     [2007]   

Copiapoathon 2006

21 November

Huasco to Labrar and back

My arms were aching from yesterday's wrestling match with the car, but all was soon forgotten as we started to look at our plans for today. Now that we had found the way to get to Alto del Carmen and San Felix, after our failure to find our way out of  Vallenar, today seemed a good opportunity to get  it right. Bart & Marijke were going to take it easy around Huasco and Juan & Florencia wanted to take another look at C. humilis ssp australis. But first, Bart wanted to show us a location near Freirina where, on a previous visit, he had found 'some interesting Copiapoa'.

And so we drove through Freirina, Bart suddenly turned right into a narrow street with an impressive 30 m (100 ft) of steep concrete steps at its end. How on earth were we going to get up them? At the bottom of the steps, we turned left into a street that eventually led us south out of the town. As the road zigzagged up the hill, we drove through cactus covered scenery. We stopped, 1 km out of town (S590), to see what we had found: Copiapoa alticostata, but a much healthier and varied population than the one that I was familiar with, further inland at Maitencillo. Now I really understood why this taxon is considered to be a natural hybrid between C. echinoides, that is usually found on the northern side of the Rio Huasco and C. coquimbana that has its distribution area to the south of the river. Both the natural parents were clearly present, but the hybrid offspring was by far the dominant plant. So if this was proof that Copiapoa genes can cross rivers, what stops them from spreading further than just the area immediately around the opposite shore?

This of course prompted the question of how much farther south C. echinoides and C. alticostata could be found. A quick look at the maps, a brief discussion and the plans for the day were shelved and we agreed instead to see if we could get to the end of the track at Labrar, aiming to stop every 5 km to see what was growing along the track.

Those contemplating coming along for Copiapoathon 2007 should note, that although quite detailed plans are drawn up in advance - in fact we have already started - Rudolf, Ricardo and I are quite capable of changing our mind of what we'll do on the day. That's why we encourage participants to organise themselves into car parties that are capable of implementing their own alternative plans. Our role is primarily facilitating in the field, and if we should wish to change plans on the day, we'll make sure that those that want to stick to the original plan have all the information needed to do so. Arrangements agreed to meet up with others on a particular day at a particular place are set in concrete and will only be broken if the health of cars and participants leave no other option, when every attempt will be made to contact the other parties.

S591 was at the top of the hill, at a sign indicating that the track to to east went to the Freirina rubbish tip - thanks for the warning. C. altocostata was still the dominant Copiapoa. We continued south.

S592 was near Piedras Grandes, Here we had moved into C. coquimbana country, but with two forms, both clumping, but one with large heads and the other with more, but smaller heads, with only a few C. echinoides and C. alticostata plants found, but where one draws the border is very subjective. Again, the plants were in flower. We took some pictures of the flowers in cross section as I wanted to prove my gut feel that the shape of the flower is not a reliable aid in identifying Copiapoa taxa. Here were cup-, no, almost saucer-shaped flowers and narrow funnelform flowers all within the same species. How did I know they were from plants of the same species? Because they came from the same plant!  Juan found some Eulychnia fruits - the largest I have seen, definitely E. acida.

S593 was on a plain, with hills in the distance. Looking ahead we could see our track zigzag up a hillside - more switchbacks! I was comforted by the size of the trucks that would regularly come past us - the Hilux should easily take these bends - and yet concerned about meeting one of these monsters head on - would their brakes work? Desert scrub was the dominant flora here, but once we started looking between the shrubs, we soon found a number Copiapoa - were these coquimbana or alticostata? The longer you look, the more confused you become.

We drove up the Cuesta Arco Molle and stopped to take some shots of the road below us. It was a bit too dangerous to park for any length on these bends, so we moved on to km 14.650, according to the road side marker (S594), but my only pictures here were scenery shots showing Eulychnia and Miqueliopuntia

S595 was at km 19.650 (clearly there was some road building planned for this track, why else would the area have been surveyed in such detail?) The cacti hiding between the shrubs were Eriosyce, Juan suggested the name E. huascensis, which I see should now be E. eriosyzoides ssp. atroviridis var. huasccensis A. Hoffmann & H. Walter, but who has labels long enough to accommodate such names?

At S596 we found Copiapoa in flower. Surely this was C. coquimbana, but with white farina? And with the longest spines I have seen on any Copiapoa. But what else could be growing here? Miqueliopuntia miquelii was also in flower with pale yellow or pink flowers. The sprawling Eulychnia that I had first noticed at Los Choros appeared on the scene, so floristically, there was a connection between this location and the Llano de Choros? 

At S597, I spotted the sprawling Eulychnia in bud: E. acida with the uncharacteristic  hairs as seen at Los Choros, not quite as long and dense, but definitely hairy. Angie also spotted a nice 'Eriosyce-with-the-long-name' in flower. 

We passed signs for the settlement of Fraguita, but failed to find any dwellings, then signs for Cobaltera, apparently a deserted Cobalt mine and Cementero where again the name seemed to suggest why people might have settled here, but where were they now?

And so we arrived at our goal, Labrar (S598). Before the trip, back in England, I had checked Google for Labrar and found that the (translated) definition of the word in Spanish is: 'To work in an office. To work a matter, to do something. To cultivate the Earth.  To plow.   To do, to form something.'  Curious! Labrar has a population of 215 people living in a 7 km radius. We only saw two men, three horses, some dogs and a collection of sheep and goats, but that was actually at the landmark sign. I had found pictures of the two 18 m (54 ft) tall chimneys, built by Carlos Lambert in 1830, for a copper smelting plant. They were given National Monument status in 1980. These two chimneys are the only evidence remaining of the famed Huasco copper mines of the mid-19th Century.

There was a deserted campsite with a toilet block without a door, but not much else. Juan made some enquiries at the nearby house that revealed that it was possible to follow the track to El Sarco and so link up with the tracks to Domeyko and Los Choros that we had visited earlier on. Today we did not have supplies to test this advise and needed to get back to our luggage in the hotel in Huasco, but this has been pencilled in as an interesting possibility for 2007. 

We drove back as three individual car parties, stopping where fancy took us. Angie & I stopped at or near some of the places already reported, to take more pictures and a bit more detailed look.

Tomorrow our 3 car team would start breaking up, with Bart & Marijke staying on for another few weeks, travelling north to Antofagasta for their flight back to the Netherlands just before Christmas.


< Previous]            [Next >

All material, except where otherwise credited, is Copyright
  © 2001-2006 Paul Klaassen
 
---------- end of page ----------